JM Eagle Whistleblower Lawsuit

As reported by Forbes, a California jury found the manufacturer – JM Eagle – liable for defrauding government purchasers in the JM Eagle whistleblower lawsuit:

  • evidence consisted of internal documents suggesting the company may have shipped pipe that failed to meet industry standards
  • JM Eagle whistleblower lawsuit whistleblower never appeared – anonymity under the whistleblower laws, false claims act and qui tam laws
  • jury never heard evidence
    • that the JM Eagle whistleblower lawsuit whistleblower, a former employee who stands to make 15-30% of any judgment, was fired for allegedly seeking kickbacks from customer
    • or that government-commissioned tests by an independent laboratory showed that JM Eagle pipe met standards.
    • Fired employee claims he lost his job in retaliation for a memo criticizing the company’s management.
  • Several municipalities dropped out because they never purchased JM Eagle pipe.
  • Three states — Nevada, New Mexico and Virginia — and 42 cities and water districts remained active plaintiffs
  • The case boiled down to allegations of fraud and not about the defective products

Contact Us

At the Gooch Law Firm, we pride ourselves on providing our clients reliable representation for even the most challenging cases. If you need help with providing information anonymously (to the Department of Justice or The Office of the Whistleblower) about potential fraud (e.g., health care fraud, defense department contract fraud, securities fraud – governmental or non-governmental, contract fraud etc.), contact our office at 1.844.329.5955.