<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Sleuth® ** Case Watch℠ - Birth Defect Archives &#8212; Gooch Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legalsleuth.com/category/birth-defect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legalsleuth.com/category/birth-defect/</link>
	<description>The Source for All Things Legal ℠ - Information, Resources and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-bav-glaxosmithkline/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve with aortic valve insufficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#38; GlaxoSmithKline is about a mother who took paxil during pregnancy and alleges that the paxil caused her child&#8217;s birth defect (e.g., bicuspid aortic valve, BAV). The Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#38; GlaxoSmithKline case in the United States District Court, D. Connecticut recently ruled on a motion to strike or exclude [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-bav-glaxosmithkline/">Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil, Birth Defect &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxosmithkline/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilateral clubfoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clubfoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil, Birth Defect &#38; GlaxoSmithKline is about a mother who took paxil during pregnancy and alleges that the paxil caused her child&#8217;s birth defect (e.g., clubfoot). The Paxil, Birth Defect &#38; GlaxoSmithKline case in the United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division recently ruled on a motion to strike an expert report. A brief summary of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxosmithkline/">Paxil, Birth Defect &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#038; MDL</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zofran-glaxo-birth-defect-mdl/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zofran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#38; MDL case is about mothers that took Zofran (ondansetron, generic Zofran) during pregnancy and gave birth to a child with a birth defect (e.g., congenital defect, heart defects&#8230;). Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#38; MDL: A recent case in the United States District Court, D. Massachusetts ruled on the issue [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zofran-glaxo-birth-defect-mdl/">Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#038; MDL</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#038; Bostic</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zofran-glaxo-birth-defect-bostic/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hole in the heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pike county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pikeville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zofran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#38; Bostic: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division, Pikeville ruled on a motion to remand and sever. The Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#38; Bostic case is about a Kentucky mother that took Zofran (ondansetron, generic Zofran) during her pregnancy and gave birth to a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zofran-glaxo-birth-defect-bostic/">Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#038; Bostic</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#038; Collier</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxo-collier/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#38; Collier: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division ruled on a motion to dismiss et al. The Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#38; Collier case is about a Missouri mother that took Paxil during her pregnancy and gave birth to a child with a birth defect. A brief summary [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxo-collier/">Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#038; Collier</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoloft Product Liability Litigation</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-product-liability-litigation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiovascular birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[septal defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoloft]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zoloft Product Liability Litigation: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal related to exclude an expert report. The Zoloft Product Liability Litigation case is about whether an expert report should be excluded in connection with whether Zoloft &#8211; taken during early pregnancy, is capable of causing, or contributing [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-product-liability-litigation/">Zoloft Product Liability Litigation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#038; Czimmer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/topamax-cleft-lip-janssen-czimmer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft lip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft palate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janssen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#38; Czimmer: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal related to trial court&#8217;s judgment. The Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#38; Czimmer case is about a Pennsylvania mother that took Topamax for migraine headaches (e.g. other reasons &#8211; migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during her pregnancy and gave [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/topamax-cleft-lip-janssen-czimmer/">Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#038; Czimmer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gurley, Janssen, Topamax &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/gurley-janssen-topamax-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft lip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft palate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epileptic episode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janssen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lexapro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myoclonic seizures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Gurley, Janssen, Topamax &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal related to federal preemption and awards. The Gurley, Janssen, Topamax &#38; Birth Defects case documents what the children of many women that took Topamax for a health concern (e.g. migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during pregnancy may face [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/gurley-janssen-topamax-birth-defects/">Gurley, Janssen, Topamax &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MN, Smithkline Beechman, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/mn-smithkline-beechman-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 18:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atrial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[septal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beechman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VSD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>MN, Smithkline Beechman, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Northern Division recently ruled on a motion to remand. MN, Smithkline Beechman, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects (e.g., atrial &#38; septal heart [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/mn-smithkline-beechman-paxil-birth-defects/">MN, Smithkline Beechman, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rheinfrank, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/rheinfrank-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-epilepsy drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depakote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fetal valproate syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migraine headache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rheinfrank, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect:  A recent case in the United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division ruled on motion to dismiss claims. The Rheinfrank, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect case documents what the children of many women that took Depakote for a health concern (e.g. migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during pregnancy may face today &#8211; a potential [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/rheinfrank-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/">Rheinfrank, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitt, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/hitt-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-epilepsy drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depakote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migraine headache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spina bifida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinal cord defect]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6692</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hitt, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect: A recent case from the past couple of years in the United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division ruled on a request for remand. The Hitt, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect case documents what the children of many women that took Depakote for a health concern (e.g. migraine headache, anti-epilepsy [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/hitt-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/">Hitt, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benjamin, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/benjamin-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-epilepsy drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depakote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spina bifida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinal cord defect]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect:  A recent case from the past couple of years in the United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division ruled on a request for remand. The Benjamin, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect case documents what the children of many women that took Depakote for a health concern (e.g. migraine headache, anti-epilepsy [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/benjamin-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/">Benjamin, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lejune, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/lejune-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-epilepsy drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depakote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spina bifida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinal cord defect]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lejune, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect:  A recent case in the United States District Court, S.D. Illinois ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Lejune, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect case documents what the children of many women that took Depakote for a health concern (e.g. migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during pregnancy may face today &#8211; a potential [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/lejune-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/">Lejune, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/forbes-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-epilepsy drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depakote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migraine headache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mild depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spina bifida]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect:  A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division ruled on a protective order. The Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect case documents what the children of many women that took Depakote for a health concern (e.g. migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during pregnancy may face today &#8211; a potential [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/forbes-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/">Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>JP, McKesson, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/jp-mckesson-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left ventricular hypertrophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulmonary stenosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>JP, McKesson, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. California recently ruled on a motion to remand. JP, McKesson, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of paxil (e.g., for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/jp-mckesson-paxil-birth-defects/">JP, McKesson, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/hensley-forest-pharmaceuticals-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lexapro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division recently ruled on a motion to transfer. Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/hensley-forest-pharmaceuticals-paxil-birth-defects/">Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/callahan-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aortic valve stenosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent ductus arteriosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[severe coarctation of the aorta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania recently ruled on a motion to transfer. Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of paxil [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/callahan-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/kiker-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infant respiratory distress syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ventricular septal defect]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania recently ruled on a motion to remand. Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of paxil (e.g., [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/kiker-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/a-s-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 19:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ingested Paxil while pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit recently ruled on a motion to remand. A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/a-s-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/orrick-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division recently ruled on a motion remand. Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/orrick-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Re: Zoloft &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/in-re-zoloft-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidepressant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDL 2342]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoloft]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Re: Zoloft &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania recently ruled on a motion on expert testimony. In Re: Zoloft &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many zoloft prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of zoloft during pregnancy. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/in-re-zoloft-birth-defects/">In Re: Zoloft &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/a-p-minor-iolnay-ferez-glaxosmithkline-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac birth defects in babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart murmur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil during pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy and persistent pulmonary hypertension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right Ventricular Hypertrophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tricuspid Atresia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tricuspid atresia type II-B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division recently ruled on a motion for summary judgment. A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/a-p-minor-iolnay-ferez-glaxosmithkline-paxil-birth-defects/">A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>J.F., Minor, Moore, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/j-f-minor-moore-glaxosmithkline-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac birth defects in babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chiari I Malformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital neural tube defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gsk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paroxetine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil during pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preganant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssri]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>J.F., Minor, Moore, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. California recently ruled on a motion to remand. J.F., Minor, Moore, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/j-f-minor-moore-glaxosmithkline-paxil-birth-defects/">J.F., Minor, Moore, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoloft Lawsuit and MDL</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-lawsuit-mdl/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craniosynostosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omphacele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoloft]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zoloft lawsuits are on the rise. A federal Zoloft lawsuit is filed in the federal MDL court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and &#8220;involves allegations that Zoloft, a prescription medication approved for the treatment of depression and other ailments, causes birth defects in children when their mothers ingest the drug while pregnant.&#8221; And, Pfizer [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-lawsuit-mdl/">Zoloft Lawsuit and MDL</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil Lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-lawsuit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[club foot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart valve defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goochlawfirm.com/?p=4110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil Lawsuit: In recent years, there have been many paxil lawsuits filed by parents based on injuries sustained by their children.  This type of paxil lawsuit was related to birth defect injuries &#8211; major and/or cardiovascular malformations associated with a specific SSRI (e.g., fluoxetine, paroxetine (PAXIL), sertraline (ZOLOFT), citalopram, escitalopram, and fluvoxamine). In a paxil [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-lawsuit/">Paxil Lawsuit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water Contamination At Camp Lejeune</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/water-contamination-at-camp-lejeune/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Pollution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goochlawfirm.com/?p=3560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As reported by Reuters, water contamination at Camp Lejeune military base in North Carolina has been linked to increased risk of birth defects and childhood cancers, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC&#8217;s Agency for Toxic Substance &#38; Disease Registry confirmed a long-suspected link between chemical contaminants in tap water at the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/water-contamination-at-camp-lejeune/">Water Contamination At Camp Lejeune</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoloft Lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-lawsuit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fen phen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goochlawfirm.com/?p=4101</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zoloft lawsuits are on the rise.  A federal Zoloft lawsuit is filed in the federal MDL court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and &#8220;involves allegations that Zoloft, a prescription medication approved for the treatment of depression and other ailments, causes birth defects in children when their mothers ingest the drug while pregnant.&#8221; And, Pfizer [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-lawsuit/">Zoloft Lawsuit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA, Topamax, Cleft Lip &#038; Birth Defect</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/fda-topamax-cleft-lip-birth-defect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 02:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft lip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft palate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=4802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>FDA, Topamax, Cleft Lip &#38; Birth Defect: Back in March 2011, the FDA review of topamax was a startling revelation to many of its users.  The FDA review of topamax published in 2011 concerning the use of TOPAMAX® during pregnancy stated that if you take Topamax during pregnancy, your baby has a higher risk for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/fda-topamax-cleft-lip-birth-defect/">FDA, Topamax, Cleft Lip &#038; Birth Defect</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topamax and Birth Defect</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/topamax-and-birth-defect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 01:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft lip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft palate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=4780</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Topamax and Birth Defect: TOPAMAX® is manufactured for by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  Janssen is located in Titusville, New Jersey.  Unfortunately, Topamax may be associated with birth defects.  Several topamax lawsuit filings have concerned the use of topamax and subsequent birth defects. TOPAMAX® is a prescription medicine primarily used to help with seizures and migraines.  In [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/topamax-and-birth-defect/">Topamax and Birth Defect</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoloft Pregnancy and Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-pregnancy-and-persistent-pulmonary-hypertension/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goochlawfirm.com/?p=4122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zoloft, Pregnancy and Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the newborn may have a connected and troubled relationship when it includes an SSRI.  A recent study about zoloft pregnancy and persistent pulmonary hypertension in BMJ, states that &#8220;the risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn seems to be increased for infants exposed to SSRIs in late [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-pregnancy-and-persistent-pulmonary-hypertension/">Zoloft Pregnancy and Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
