<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Sleuth®, Author at Legal Sleuth® Gooch Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legalsleuth.com/author/admin-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legalsleuth.com/author/admin-2/</link>
	<description>The Source for All Things Legal ℠ - Information, Resources and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 23:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Navy, Behrmann</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-mesothelioma-navy-behrmann/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Admiralty, Jones Act & Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and ABB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc chutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos-containing arc chutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit breakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cutler Hammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricians' mate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journeyman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lockheed shipyard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meriden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Square D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switching devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tacoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tod shipyard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=8097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Navy, Behrmann: A case in the United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma (1.26.2021), ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Navy, Behrmann case is about defendants motion for summary judgment. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Meriden Molded Plastic, Inc.&#8217;s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff alleges both [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-mesothelioma-navy-behrmann/">Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Navy, Behrmann</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Boston &#038; Aerco</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-mesothelioma-boston-aerco/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos dust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engine gaskets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naval shipyard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scraped engine gaskets]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=8088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Boston &#38; Aerco: A case in the Supreme Court New York County (1.21.2021), ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Boston &#38; Aerco case is about defendant McCord Corporation&#8217;s (&#8220;McCord&#8221;) motion for summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212, to dismiss plaintiff&#8217;s Complaint and all cross-claims, based on plaintiff&#8217;s alleged failure [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-mesothelioma-boston-aerco/">Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Boston &#038; Aerco</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DISCLAIMER</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/disclaimer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 20:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By Gooch Law Firm: Below are the terms and conditions applicable to the interpretation and use of the material and information provided in this website. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the Gooch Law Firm at 440 Louisiana, Suite 900 ☎ (844) 329-5955 &#124; ☎ (713) 714-1610&#124; Legal Sleuth and Gooch Law [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/disclaimer/">DISCLAIMER</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-bav-glaxosmithkline/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve with aortic valve insufficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#38; GlaxoSmithKline is about a mother who took paxil during pregnancy and alleges that the paxil caused her child&#8217;s birth defect (e.g., bicuspid aortic valve, BAV). The Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#38; GlaxoSmithKline case in the United States District Court, D. Connecticut recently ruled on a motion to strike or exclude [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-bav-glaxosmithkline/">Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breast Cancer, Taxotere, Hair Loss &#038; Schmitz</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/breast-cancer-taxotere-hair-loss-schmitz/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alopecia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aventis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baldness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemptherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent hair loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanofi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanofi-aventis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxotere]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Breast Cancer, Taxotere, Hair Loss &#38; Schmitz is a case about a woman that allegedly took the prescription drug taxotere for treatment of breast cancer and later suffered hair loss. In the recent court order &#8211; in the California case, Breast Cancer, Taxotere, Hair Loss &#38; Schmitz, the Court stayed the action pending the upcoming [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/breast-cancer-taxotere-hair-loss-schmitz/">Breast Cancer, Taxotere, Hair Loss &#038; Schmitz</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baby Powder, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Mikhlin</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/baby-powder-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-mikhlin/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 15:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Baby Powder, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Mikhlin: A case in the United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, Eastern Division, ruled on a motion to dismiss and strike. The Baby Powder, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Mikhlin case is about woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from use of baby powder products that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/baby-powder-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-mikhlin/">Baby Powder, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Mikhlin</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baby Powder, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Hogans</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/baby-powder-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-hogans/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 14:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Baby Powder, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Hogans: A case in the United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, Eastern Division, ruled on a motion to remand. The Baby Powder, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Hogans case is about woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from use of baby powder products that may contain [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/baby-powder-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-hogans/">Baby Powder, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Hogans</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Swann</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-swann/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 17:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos in talcum powder and mesothelioma in women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Swann: A case in the United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, Eastern Division, ruled on a motion to remand. The Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Swann case is about a woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from her use of the baby powder products that may contain asbestos [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-swann/">Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Swann</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Berg</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-berg/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 17:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Berg: A case in the United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division, ruled on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and alternative motion to strike. The Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Berg case is about a woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-berg/">Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Berg</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Mihalich</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-mihalich/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 15:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Mihalich: A case in the United States District Court, S.D. Illinois, ruled on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and alternative motion to strike. The Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Mihalich case is about a woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from her use [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-mihalich/">Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Mihalich</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Estrada</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-estrada/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 13:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Estrada: A case in the United States District Court, E.D. California, ruled on motion to dismiss. The Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Estrada case is about a woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from her use of the baby powder products that may contain asbestos and other [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-estrada/">Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Estrada</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Ferrar</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-ferrartalc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-ferrar/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 18:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Ferrar: A case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division, ruled on motion to remand. For more on asbestos exposure and the potential problems associated with asbestos exposure (e.g., asbestosis, cancer, lung cancer, mesothelioma&#8230;), please follow this link: AML Contact Us At the Gooch Law [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-ferrartalc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-ferrar/">Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Ferrar</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Celbulske</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-celbulske/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 16:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Celbulske: A case in the United States District Court, S.D. Illinois, ruled on motion to dismiss. The Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Celbulske case is about a woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from her use of the baby powder products that may contain asbestos and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-celbulske/">Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Celbulske</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson &#038; Ovarian Cancer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 15:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson &#38; Ovarian Cancer: A case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division, ruled on motion to dismiss. The Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson &#38; Ovarian Cancer case is about a woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from her use of the baby powder products that may contain asbestos and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer/">Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson &#038; Ovarian Cancer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil, Birth Defect &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxosmithkline/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilateral clubfoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clubfoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil, Birth Defect &#38; GlaxoSmithKline is about a mother who took paxil during pregnancy and alleges that the paxil caused her child&#8217;s birth defect (e.g., clubfoot). The Paxil, Birth Defect &#38; GlaxoSmithKline case in the United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division recently ruled on a motion to strike an expert report. A brief summary of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxosmithkline/">Paxil, Birth Defect &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#038; MDL</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zofran-glaxo-birth-defect-mdl/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zofran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#38; MDL case is about mothers that took Zofran (ondansetron, generic Zofran) during pregnancy and gave birth to a child with a birth defect (e.g., congenital defect, heart defects&#8230;). Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#38; MDL: A recent case in the United States District Court, D. Massachusetts ruled on the issue [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zofran-glaxo-birth-defect-mdl/">Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#038; MDL</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breast Cancer, Taxotere &#038; Hair Loss</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/breast-cancer-taxotere-hair-loss/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alopecia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aventis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baldness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docetaxel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[french]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent hair loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent significant alopecia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanofi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanofi-aventis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxotere]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7829</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Breast Cancer, Taxotere &#38; Hair Loss: Recent information has surfaced that the intravenous chemotherapy breast cancer drug &#8211; Taxotere by Sanofi &#8211; may cause permanent hair loss (alopecia). We all hope that when your doctor prescribes a drug to help you manage or overcome a health problem, you trust that it will be safe and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/breast-cancer-taxotere-hair-loss/">Breast Cancer, Taxotere &#038; Hair Loss</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asbestos, Talcum Powder &#038; Ovarian Cancer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-talcum-powder-ovarian-cancer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[st louis missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7798</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Asbestos, Talcum Powder &#38; Ovarian Cancer: A case in the United States District Court, S.D. Illinois, ruled on motion to remand. The Asbestos, Talcum Powder &#38; Ovarian Cancer case is about a woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from her use of the baby powder products that may contain asbestos and other carcinogenic chemicals. A [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-talcum-powder-ovarian-cancer/">Asbestos, Talcum Powder &#038; Ovarian Cancer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asbestos, Talcum Powder, Johnson &#038; Johnson &#038; Ovarian Cancer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-talcum-powder-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7793</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Asbestos, Talcum Powder, Johnson &#38; Johnson &#38; Harlan: A case in the United States District Court, S.D. Illinois, ruled on motion to remand. The Asbestos, Talcum Powder, Johnson &#38; Johnson &#38; Ovarian Cancer case is about a woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from her use of the baby powder products that may contain asbestos [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-talcum-powder-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer/">Asbestos, Talcum Powder, Johnson &#038; Johnson &#038; Ovarian Cancer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#038; Bostic</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zofran-glaxo-birth-defect-bostic/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hole in the heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pike county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pikeville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zofran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#38; Bostic: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division, Pikeville ruled on a motion to remand and sever. The Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#38; Bostic case is about a Kentucky mother that took Zofran (ondansetron, generic Zofran) during her pregnancy and gave birth to a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zofran-glaxo-birth-defect-bostic/">Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#038; Bostic</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#038; Collier</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxo-collier/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#38; Collier: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division ruled on a motion to dismiss et al. The Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#38; Collier case is about a Missouri mother that took Paxil during her pregnancy and gave birth to a child with a birth defect. A brief summary [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxo-collier/">Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#038; Collier</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoloft Product Liability Litigation</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-product-liability-litigation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiovascular birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[septal defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoloft]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zoloft Product Liability Litigation: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal related to exclude an expert report. The Zoloft Product Liability Litigation case is about whether an expert report should be excluded in connection with whether Zoloft &#8211; taken during early pregnancy, is capable of causing, or contributing [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-product-liability-litigation/">Zoloft Product Liability Litigation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#038; Czimmer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/topamax-cleft-lip-janssen-czimmer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft lip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft palate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janssen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#38; Czimmer: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal related to trial court&#8217;s judgment. The Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#38; Czimmer case is about a Pennsylvania mother that took Topamax for migraine headaches (e.g. other reasons &#8211; migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during her pregnancy and gave [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/topamax-cleft-lip-janssen-czimmer/">Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#038; Czimmer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holcomb, Georgia Pacific, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/holcomb-georgia-pacific-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bondex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brake mechanic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia-pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint compound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaiser gypsum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lohrmann test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paco quik set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union carbide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Holcomb, Georgia Pacific, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Supreme Court of Nevada ruled on appeal of a trial court verdict in connection with motions for summary judgment and causation tests. A brief summary of the Holcomb, Georgia Pacific, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case: Randy Holcomb&#8217;s died from mesothelioma, a cancer affecting the lining of the lungs, typically caused by exposure [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/holcomb-georgia-pacific-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Holcomb, Georgia Pacific, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dufrene, Guidry Brothers, Jones Act &#038; Seaman</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/dufrene-guidry-brothers-jones-act-seaman/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Admiralty, Jones Act & Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidry brothers towing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvey gulf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jones act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seaman]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dufrene, Guidry Brothers, Jones Act &#38; Seaman: A recent case in the Court of Appeals Louisiana, Fourth Circuit ruled on appeal of a trial court verdict. The Dufrene, Guidry Brothers, Jones Act &#38; Seaman is about a seaman that alleges a hearing loss injury as a result of his work as a seaman on on an offshore [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/dufrene-guidry-brothers-jones-act-seaman/">Dufrene, Guidry Brothers, Jones Act &#038; Seaman</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Synatzske, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/synatzske-union-carbide-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union carbide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful death]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Synatzske, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Supreme Court of Texas reviewed a lower court&#8217;s decision. The Synatzske, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case is about a Texas man that worked as an insulator at a Union Carbide plant.  Allegedly, he developed mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos (e.g., possibly from the asbestos in the insulation used on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/synatzske-union-carbide-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Synatzske, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abutahoun, Dow, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/abutahoun-dow-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow chemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abutahoun, Dow, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Court of Appeals California, Second District, Division Four ruled on an appeal. The Abutahoun, Dow, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case is about a Texas man that worked as an independent contractor installing asbestos laden pipeline in the chemical industry at a Dow Chemicals plant.  Allegedly, he developed mesothelioma from exposure to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/abutahoun-dow-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Abutahoun, Dow, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marteney, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/marteney-union-carbide-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia-pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint compound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paco quick set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union carbide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Marteney, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Court of Appeals California, Second District, Division Four ruled on an appeal. The Marteney, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case is about a California man that worked construction industry and alleged he developed mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos (e.., from joint compound manufactured by Union Carbide &#8211; e.g., Gold Bond, Paco [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/marteney-union-carbide-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Marteney, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schiffer, CBS, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/schiffer-cbs-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bystander exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turbine]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Schiffer, CBS, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Court of Appeals California, First District, Division One ruled on an appeal of summary judgment. The Schiffer, CBS, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case is about a California man that worked at a turbine manufacturer manufacturer and alleged he developed mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos (e.., bystander or bystander exposure) while working at [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/schiffer-cbs-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Schiffer, CBS, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melendez, Ameron, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/melendez-ameron-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ameron international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos pipe covering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bondstrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipe]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Melendez, Ameron, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Court of Appeals California, Second District, Division Four ruled on an appeal of summary judgment. The Melendez, Ameron, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case is about a California man that worked at a pipe manufacturer and alleged he developed mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos while working at the pipe manufacturing plant.   [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/melendez-ameron-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Melendez, Ameron, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soto, Borg-Warner, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/soto-borg-warner-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos dust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos fibers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borg Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van nuys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Soto, Borg-Warner, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Court of Appeals California, Second District, Division Four ruled on an appeal of summary judgment. The Soto, Borg-Warner, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case is about a man that worked at the General Motors plant in Van Nuys, California and alleged that he developed mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos (asbestos dust, asbestos fibers) [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/soto-borg-warner-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Soto, Borg-Warner, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murat, Exxon Mobil, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/murat-exxon-mobil-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sear river maritime]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Murat, Exxon Mobil, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Court of Appeals California, Second District, Division Four ruled on an appeal of summary judgment. The Murat, Exxon Mobil, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case is about an owner of a vessel repair company alleging that he developed mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos while working onboard defendants&#8217; (Sea River Maritime and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/murat-exxon-mobil-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Murat, Exxon Mobil, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leidig, Zenith, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/leidig-zenith-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zenith]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Leidig, Zenith, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Court of Appeals California, Second District, Division Four ruled on an appeal of motion for summary judgment. The Leidig, Zenith, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what the spouse (e.g. second hand asbestos exposure) of an auto mechanic that worked on brakes (e.g. abrading brake linings) may face today after [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/leidig-zenith-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Leidig, Zenith, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sherman, Hennessy, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/sherman-hennessy-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abrade brake linings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto mechanic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brake linings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hennessy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second hand asbestos exposure]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sherman, Hennessy, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Court of Appeals California, Second District, Division Four ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Sherman, Hennessy, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what the spouse (e.g. second hand asbestos exposure) of an auto mechanic that worked on brakes (e.g. abrading brake linings) may face today after past potential [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/sherman-hennessy-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Sherman, Hennessy, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Casey, Dynalectric, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/casey-dynalectric-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crocker plaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynalectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical intallation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fireproofing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plumber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rodoni-becker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Casey, Dynalectric, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what a plumber that worked on a job site during the electrical installation may face today after past potential asbestos exposure &#8211; possible mesothelioma. Casey, Dynalectric, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Court of Appeals California, First District, Division Three ruled on a motion for summary judgment.  A brief [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/casey-dynalectric-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Casey, Dynalectric, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feaster, A.W. Chesterton, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/feaster-a-w-chesterton-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 08:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aw chestrton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipfitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipyard]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Feaster, A.W. Chesterton, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Camden Vicinage ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Feaster, A.W. Chesterton, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what a shipfitter, electrician and others working at a shipyard may face today after past potential asbestos exposure &#8211;  mesothelioma. For more on this [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/feaster-a-w-chesterton-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Feaster, A.W. Chesterton, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aubin, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/aubin-union-carbide-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall joint compound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peritoneal mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sg-210 calidria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union carbide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Aubin, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A recent case in the Supreme Court of Florida ruled on a motion to exclude evidence. The Aubin, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many construction workers (sanding, using drywall joint compounds etc.) may face today &#8211; past potential asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. A brief summary of the facts include: [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/aubin-union-carbide-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Aubin, Union Carbide, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Folta, Ferro Engineering, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/folta-ferro-engineering-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Folta, Ferro Engineering, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Supreme Court of Illinois ruled on an appeal of a workers&#8217; compensation claim (addressing some time limitations). The Folta, Ferro Engineering, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what a shipping clerk at an engineering company may face today after past potential asbestos exposure &#8211; mesothelioma. A brief summary [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/folta-ferro-engineering-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Folta, Ferro Engineering, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bryant, General Motors, Asbestos &#038; Lung Cancer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/bryant-general-motors-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defiance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7532</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Bryant, General Motors, Asbestos &#38; Lung Cancer: A case in the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Third District, Defiance County ruled on an appeal of a workers&#8217; compensation claim. The Bryant, General Motors, Asbestos &#38; Lung Cancer case documents what a auto manufacturing plant worker may face today after past potential asbestos exposure &#8211; lung cancer. A brief [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/bryant-general-motors-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Bryant, General Motors, Asbestos &#038; Lung Cancer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bell, ABB, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/bell-abb-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 17:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boiler operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uss roosevelt]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Bell, ABB, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the United States District Court, S.D. Illinois ruled on an appeal of summary judgment. The Bell, ABB, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many seaman in the navy (e.g. working on boilers, evaporators etc.) may face today after past potential asbestos exposure &#8211;  mesothelioma. A brief summary of the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/bell-abb-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Bell, ABB, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brust, Foster Wheeler, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/brust-foster-wheeler-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 16:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air brake systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port authority transit corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[take-home asbetos exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[train operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yard operator]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Brust, Foster Wheeler, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Brust, Foster Wheeler, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case is about secondary asbestos exposure and mesothelioma.  The parent of the child worked as a train operator, yard operator, and supervisor at the Port Authority Transit Corporation. A [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/brust-foster-wheeler-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Brust, Foster Wheeler, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wilson, Westinghouse, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/wilson-westinghouse-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit breakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draftsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norfolk naval shipyard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipfitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Wilson, Westinghouse, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Wilson, Westinghouse, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what a shipfitter, electrician and others working at a shipyard may face today after past potential asbestos exposure &#8211;  mesothelioma. A brief summary of the facts [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/wilson-westinghouse-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Wilson, Westinghouse, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stallings, Georgia Pacific, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/stallings-georgia-pacific-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boiler operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crane company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia-pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uss waller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Stallings, Georgia Pacific, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Stallings, Georgia Pacific, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many in the Navy working as a boiler operator may face today after past potential asbestos exposure &#8211;  mesothelioma. A brief summary [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/stallings-georgia-pacific-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Stallings, Georgia Pacific, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curtis, ABB, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/curtis-abb-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eaton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schneider electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Curtis, ABB, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth circuit ruled on an appeal of summary judgment. The Curtis, ABB, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many repairing electrical equipment may face today after past potential asbestos exposure &#8211;  mesothelioma. A brief summary of the facts include: Plaintiff failed to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/curtis-abb-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Curtis, ABB, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sydow, Weyerhauser, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/sydow-weyerhauser-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weyerhauser]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sydow, Weyerhauser, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A case in the United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin ruled on various motions. The Sydow, Weyerhauser, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many may face today after past potential asbestos exposure &#8211;  mesothelioma. A brief summary of the facts include: Plaintiffs allege a variety of claims arising out of Wesley Sydow&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/sydow-weyerhauser-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Sydow, Weyerhauser, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philip, Hornbeck, Jones Act &#038; Seaman</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/philip-hornbeck-jones-act-seaman/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Admiralty, Jones Act & Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admiralty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eni us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hornbeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jones act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lhwca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[longnecker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[longshore and harbor workers' compensation actport of baltimore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rigger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seaman]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Philip, Hornbeck, Jones Act &#38; Seaman: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana ruled on a Motion for Summary Judgment. The Philip, Hornbeck, Jones Act &#38; Seaman case documents what many workers on a vessel, helicopter, tugboat, ship, offshore, oil rig, oil platform, roustabouts, barge, longshoreman and seaman may face today – an onshore [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/philip-hornbeck-jones-act-seaman/">Philip, Hornbeck, Jones Act &#038; Seaman</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barto, McDermott, Jones Act &#038; Seaman</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/barto-mcdermott-jones-act-seaman/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Admiralty, Jones Act & Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derrick barge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jones act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jones act seaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcdermott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rigger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seaman]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7468</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Barto, McDermott, Jones Act &#38; Seaman: A recent case in the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit ruled on issues dealing with fault and damages. The Barto, McDermott, Jones Act &#38; Seaman case documents what many workers on a vessel, helicopter, tugboat, ship, offshore, oil rig, oil platform, roustabouts, barge, longshoreman and seaman may face today – an [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/barto-mcdermott-jones-act-seaman/">Barto, McDermott, Jones Act &#038; Seaman</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gibson, Ocean Shipholdings, Jones Act &#038; Seaman</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/gibson-ocean-shipholdings-jones-act-seaman/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 19:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Admiralty, Jones Act & Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief steward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jones act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public vessels act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suits in admiralty act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Gibson, Ocean Shipholdings, Jones Act &#38; Seaman: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana ruled on a Motion for Summary Judgment. The Gibson, Ocean Shipholdings, Jones Act &#38; Seaman case documents what many workers on a vessel, helicopter, tugboat, ship, offshore, oil rig, oil platform, roustabouts, barge, longshoreman and seaman may face today – [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/gibson-ocean-shipholdings-jones-act-seaman/">Gibson, Ocean Shipholdings, Jones Act &#038; Seaman</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collins, ABC Marine Towing, Jones Act &#038; Maritime</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/collins-abc-marine-towing-jones-act-maritime/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 19:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Admiralty, Jones Act & Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc marine towing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crane barge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jones act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Collins, ABC Marine Towing, Jones Act &#38; Maritime: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana ruled on a Motion for Summary Judgment on punitive damages. The Collins, ABC Marine Towing, Jones Act &#38; Maritime case documents what many workers on a vessel, helicopter, tugboat, ship, offshore, oil rig, oil platform, roustabouts, barge, longshoreman [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/collins-abc-marine-towing-jones-act-maritime/">Collins, ABC Marine Towing, Jones Act &#038; Maritime</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power Morcellator &#038; Cancer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/power-morcellator-cancer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 16:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laparoscopic surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power morcellator]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Power Morcellator &#38; Cancer: A recent proposed study reviews the affects of using different blade technology to reduce tissue spill during laparoscopic power morcellator surgery. Power Morcellator &#38; Cancer: The article on the proposed study was published in the Journal of Minmally Invasive Gynecology &#8211; Power Morcellator Features Affecting Tissue Spill in Gynecological Laparoscopy: An in vitro study [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/power-morcellator-cancer/">Power Morcellator &#038; Cancer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
