<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Image Archives - Case Watch℠ &#8212; Legal Sleuth® Gooch Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legalsleuth.com/type/image/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legalsleuth.com/type/image/</link>
	<description>The Source for All Things Legal ℠ - Information, Resources and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 23:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Navy, Behrmann</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-mesothelioma-navy-behrmann/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Admiralty, Jones Act & Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and ABB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc chutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos-containing arc chutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit breakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cutler Hammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricians' mate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journeyman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lockheed shipyard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meriden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Square D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switching devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tacoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tod shipyard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=8097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Navy, Behrmann: A case in the United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma (1.26.2021), ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Navy, Behrmann case is about defendants motion for summary judgment. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Meriden Molded Plastic, Inc.&#8217;s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff alleges both [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-mesothelioma-navy-behrmann/">Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Navy, Behrmann</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Boston &#038; Aerco</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-mesothelioma-boston-aerco/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos dust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engine gaskets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naval shipyard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scraped engine gaskets]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=8088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Boston &#38; Aerco: A case in the Supreme Court New York County (1.21.2021), ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Boston &#38; Aerco case is about defendant McCord Corporation&#8217;s (&#8220;McCord&#8221;) motion for summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212, to dismiss plaintiff&#8217;s Complaint and all cross-claims, based on plaintiff&#8217;s alleged failure [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/asbestos-mesothelioma-boston-aerco/">Asbestos, Mesothelioma, Boston &#038; Aerco</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DISCLAIMER</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/disclaimer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 20:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By Gooch Law Firm: Below are the terms and conditions applicable to the interpretation and use of the material and information provided in this website. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the Gooch Law Firm at 440 Louisiana, Suite 900 ☎ (844) 329-5955 &#124; ☎ (713) 714-1610&#124; Legal Sleuth and Gooch Law [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/disclaimer/">DISCLAIMER</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-bav-glaxosmithkline/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve with aortic valve insufficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#38; GlaxoSmithKline is about a mother who took paxil during pregnancy and alleges that the paxil caused her child&#8217;s birth defect (e.g., bicuspid aortic valve, BAV). The Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#38; GlaxoSmithKline case in the United States District Court, D. Connecticut recently ruled on a motion to strike or exclude [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-bav-glaxosmithkline/">Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breast Cancer, Taxotere, Hair Loss &#038; Schmitz</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/breast-cancer-taxotere-hair-loss-schmitz/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alopecia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aventis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baldness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemptherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent hair loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanofi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanofi-aventis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxotere]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Breast Cancer, Taxotere, Hair Loss &#38; Schmitz is a case about a woman that allegedly took the prescription drug taxotere for treatment of breast cancer and later suffered hair loss. In the recent court order &#8211; in the California case, Breast Cancer, Taxotere, Hair Loss &#38; Schmitz, the Court stayed the action pending the upcoming [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/breast-cancer-taxotere-hair-loss-schmitz/">Breast Cancer, Taxotere, Hair Loss &#038; Schmitz</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson &#038; Ovarian Cancer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 15:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson &#38; Ovarian Cancer: A case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division, ruled on motion to dismiss. The Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson &#38; Ovarian Cancer case is about a woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from her use of the baby powder products that may contain asbestos and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer/">Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson &#038; Ovarian Cancer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoloft Product Liability Litigation</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-product-liability-litigation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiovascular birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[septal defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoloft]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zoloft Product Liability Litigation: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal related to exclude an expert report. The Zoloft Product Liability Litigation case is about whether an expert report should be excluded in connection with whether Zoloft &#8211; taken during early pregnancy, is capable of causing, or contributing [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-product-liability-litigation/">Zoloft Product Liability Litigation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#038; Czimmer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/topamax-cleft-lip-janssen-czimmer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft lip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft palate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janssen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#38; Czimmer: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal related to trial court&#8217;s judgment. The Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#38; Czimmer case is about a Pennsylvania mother that took Topamax for migraine headaches (e.g. other reasons &#8211; migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during her pregnancy and gave [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/topamax-cleft-lip-janssen-czimmer/">Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#038; Czimmer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>McMann, Air Liquid Systems, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/mcmann-air-liquid-systems-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2014 03:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carpenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carpenter's apprentice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia brewery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pabst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB Decking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USS Firedrake]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>McMann, Air Liquid Systems, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A recent case in the United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma ruled on summary judgment motion. The McMann, Air Liquid Systems, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many navy vets and aboard U.S. navy ships (e.g., boilerman) or working at naval ship yards as a carpenter, carpenter&#8217;s apprentice, pipefitter and/or nuclear [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/mcmann-air-liquid-systems-asbestos-mesothelioma/">McMann, Air Liquid Systems, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anderson, Ford, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/anderson-ford-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[any breath of asbestos causes mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos dust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[every exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flowserve Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaskets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gould Pumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honeywell International Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial gaskets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packing materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipefitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plumbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sepco Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[York International Corporation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Anderson, Ford, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A recent case in the United States District Court, D. Utah ruled on a motion to exclude expert testimony. The Anderson, Ford, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many auto plant workers may face today &#8211; past exposure to asbestos and mesothelioma. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/anderson-ford-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Anderson, Ford, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
