<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Sleuth® ** Case Watch℠ - ethicon Archives &#8212; Gooch Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legalsleuth.com/tag/ethicon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legalsleuth.com/tag/ethicon/</link>
	<description>The Source for All Things Legal ℠ - Information, Resources and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 05:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Minihan, Ethicon, Power Morcellator &#038; Cancer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/minihan-ethicon-power-morcellator-cancer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 05:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laparoscopic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laparoscopic power morcellator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laparoscopic surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power morcellator]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Minihan, Ethicon, Power Morcellator &#38; Cancer: A case filed in United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin ruled on motions to dismiss. The Minihan, Ethicon, Power Morcellator &#38; Cancer alleges injuries from the use of a power morcellator during laparoscopic surgery. A brief summary of this case: Allegedly, the Plaintiff underwent laparoscopic surgery with a Laparoscopic Power Morcellator (“LPM”) [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/minihan-ethicon-power-morcellator-cancer/">Minihan, Ethicon, Power Morcellator &#038; Cancer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sanders, Ethicon &#038; Power Morcellator</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/sanders-ethicon-power-morcellator/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 16:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laparoscopic surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morcellator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power morcellator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uterine cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uterine surgery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sanders, Ethicon &#38; Power Morcellator: A case filed in United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin ruled on motions to dismiss. The Sanders, Ethicon &#38; Power Morcellator alleges injuries from the use of a power morcellator during laparoscopic surgery. A brief summary of this case: Plaintiffs, citizens of Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, claim Defendants&#8217; Power Morcellator surgical device employed during laparoscopic surgery [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/sanders-ethicon-power-morcellator/">Sanders, Ethicon &#038; Power Morcellator</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barnett, Power Morcellator &#038; Laparoscopic Surgery</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/barnett-power-morcellator-laparoscopic-surgery/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 19:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karl storz endoscopy america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laparoscopic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laparoscopic surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power morcellator]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Barnett, Power Morcellator &#38; Laparoscopic Surgery: A case filed in United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin ruled on motions to dismiss. The Barnett, Power Morcellator &#38; Laparoscopic Surgery alleges injuries from the use of a power morcellator during laparoscopic surgery. A brief summary of this case: Plaintiff Robyn L. Barnett asserts claim of negligence and strict liability, as well as [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/barnett-power-morcellator-laparoscopic-surgery/">Barnett, Power Morcellator &#038; Laparoscopic Surgery</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Downing, Transvaginal Mesh, Ethicon, Pelvic Mesh, Pelvic Organ Prolapse</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/downing-transvaginal-mesh-ethicon-pelvic-mesh-pelvic-organ-prolapse/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Scientific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pelvic mesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pelvic organ prolapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress urinary incontinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transvaginal Mesh]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5916</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Downing, Transvaginal Mesh, Ethicon, Pelvic Mesh, Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A recent case in the United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division recently ruled on a motion to remand. Downing, Transvaginal Mesh, Ethicon, Pelvic Mesh, Pelvic Organ Prolapse case documents what many users of pelvic mesh or transvaginal surgical mesh to treat pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/downing-transvaginal-mesh-ethicon-pelvic-mesh-pelvic-organ-prolapse/">Downing, Transvaginal Mesh, Ethicon, Pelvic Mesh, Pelvic Organ Prolapse</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
