<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Sleuth® ** Case Watch℠ - pregnant Archives &#8212; Gooch Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legalsleuth.com/tag/pregnant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legalsleuth.com/tag/pregnant/</link>
	<description>The Source for All Things Legal ℠ - Information, Resources and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 03:27:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/forbes-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-epilepsy drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depakote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migraine headache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mild depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spina bifida]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect:  A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division ruled on a protective order. The Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect case documents what the children of many women that took Depakote for a health concern (e.g. migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during pregnancy may face today &#8211; a potential [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/forbes-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/">Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>JP, McKesson, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/jp-mckesson-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left ventricular hypertrophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulmonary stenosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>JP, McKesson, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. California recently ruled on a motion to remand. JP, McKesson, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of paxil (e.g., for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/jp-mckesson-paxil-birth-defects/">JP, McKesson, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/hensley-forest-pharmaceuticals-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lexapro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division recently ruled on a motion to transfer. Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/hensley-forest-pharmaceuticals-paxil-birth-defects/">Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/callahan-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aortic valve stenosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent ductus arteriosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[severe coarctation of the aorta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania recently ruled on a motion to transfer. Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of paxil [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/callahan-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/kiker-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infant respiratory distress syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ventricular septal defect]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania recently ruled on a motion to remand. Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of paxil (e.g., [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/kiker-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/a-s-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 19:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ingested Paxil while pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit recently ruled on a motion to remand. A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/a-s-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
