<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Sleuth® ** Case Watch℠ - pregnancy Archives &#8212; Gooch Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legalsleuth.com/tag/pregnancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legalsleuth.com/tag/pregnancy/</link>
	<description>The Source for All Things Legal ℠ - Information, Resources and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#038; MDL</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zofran-glaxo-birth-defect-mdl/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zofran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#38; MDL case is about mothers that took Zofran (ondansetron, generic Zofran) during pregnancy and gave birth to a child with a birth defect (e.g., congenital defect, heart defects&#8230;). Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#38; MDL: A recent case in the United States District Court, D. Massachusetts ruled on the issue [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zofran-glaxo-birth-defect-mdl/">Zofran, Glaxo, Birth Defect &#038; MDL</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/forbes-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-epilepsy drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depakote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migraine headache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mild depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spina bifida]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect:  A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division ruled on a protective order. The Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#38; Birth Defect case documents what the children of many women that took Depakote for a health concern (e.g. migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during pregnancy may face today &#8211; a potential [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/forbes-abbott-depakote-birth-defect/">Forbes, Abbott, Depakote &#038; Birth Defect</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>JP, McKesson, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/jp-mckesson-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left ventricular hypertrophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulmonary stenosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>JP, McKesson, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. California recently ruled on a motion to remand. JP, McKesson, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of paxil (e.g., for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/jp-mckesson-paxil-birth-defects/">JP, McKesson, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/hensley-forest-pharmaceuticals-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lexapro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division recently ruled on a motion to transfer. Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/hensley-forest-pharmaceuticals-paxil-birth-defects/">Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/orrick-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division recently ruled on a motion remand. Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/orrick-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/a-p-minor-iolnay-ferez-glaxosmithkline-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac birth defects in babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart murmur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil during pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy and persistent pulmonary hypertension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right Ventricular Hypertrophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tricuspid Atresia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tricuspid atresia type II-B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division recently ruled on a motion for summary judgment. A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/a-p-minor-iolnay-ferez-glaxosmithkline-paxil-birth-defects/">A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
