<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Sleuth® ** Case Watch℠ - pennsylvania Archives &#8212; Gooch Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legalsleuth.com/tag/pennsylvania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legalsleuth.com/tag/pennsylvania/</link>
	<description>The Source for All Things Legal ℠ - Information, Resources and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:26:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Swann</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-swann/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 17:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos in talcum powder and mesothelioma in women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovarian cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shower to shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talcum powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Swann: A case in the United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, Eastern Division, ruled on a motion to remand. The Talc, Johnson &#38; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#38; Swann case is about a woman that allegedly developed ovarian cancer from her use of the baby powder products that may contain asbestos [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/talc-johnson-johnson-ovarian-cancer-swann/">Talc, Johnson &#038; Johnson, Ovarian Cancer &#038; Swann</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoloft Product Liability Litigation</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-product-liability-litigation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiovascular birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[septal defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoloft]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zoloft Product Liability Litigation: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal related to exclude an expert report. The Zoloft Product Liability Litigation case is about whether an expert report should be excluded in connection with whether Zoloft &#8211; taken during early pregnancy, is capable of causing, or contributing [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-product-liability-litigation/">Zoloft Product Liability Litigation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#038; Czimmer</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/topamax-cleft-lip-janssen-czimmer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft lip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft palate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janssen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#38; Czimmer: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal related to trial court&#8217;s judgment. The Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#38; Czimmer case is about a Pennsylvania mother that took Topamax for migraine headaches (e.g. other reasons &#8211; migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during her pregnancy and gave [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/topamax-cleft-lip-janssen-czimmer/">Topamax, Cleft Lip, Janssen &#038; Czimmer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gurley, Janssen, Topamax &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/gurley-janssen-topamax-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft lip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleft palate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epileptic episode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janssen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lexapro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myoclonic seizures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Gurley, Janssen, Topamax &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal related to federal preemption and awards. The Gurley, Janssen, Topamax &#38; Birth Defects case documents what the children of many women that took Topamax for a health concern (e.g. migraine headache, anti-epilepsy drug), during pregnancy may face [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/gurley-janssen-topamax-birth-defects/">Gurley, Janssen, Topamax &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wygant, GE, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/wygant-ge-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful death]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7173</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Wygant, GE, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on motions for appeal of statute of limitations ruling. The Wygant, GE, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many asbestos exposure victims and others may face today &#8211; past potential direct and secondary exposure to asbestos and mesothelioma. The court [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/wygant-ge-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Wygant, GE, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grunder, Fen Phen &#038; Mild Aortic Regurgitation</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/grunder-fen-phen-mild-aortic-regurgitation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aortic stenosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fen phen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart valve regurgitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mild aortic regurgitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitral valve regurgitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential primary pulmonary hypertension (pph)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary arterial hypertension (pah)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Grunder, Fen Phen &#38; Mild Aortic Regurgitation: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal denying claim benefits. The Grunder, Fen Phen &#38; Mild Aortic Regurgitation case documents what many victims who took the diet drug and weight loss pill FEN PHEN (redux) may face today – Heart Valve Regurgitation, mild aortic [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/grunder-fen-phen-mild-aortic-regurgitation/">Grunder, Fen Phen &#038; Mild Aortic Regurgitation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melnick, Exxon, Benzene &#038; Leukemia</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/melnick-exxon-benzene-leukemia/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Benzene Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benzene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leukemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lymphoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service station]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Melnick, Exxon, Benzene &#38; Leukemia: A case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on a motion for summary judgment. The Melnick, Exxon, Benzene &#38; Leukemia case documents what many people (deck officers, mates, able bodied seaman, tankerman on various vessels in navigation) may face today that may have worked in or around the petroleum industry, chemical industry [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/melnick-exxon-benzene-leukemia/">Melnick, Exxon, Benzene &#038; Leukemia</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nelson, Airco Welders, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/nelson-airco-welders-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 19:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hobart Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lukens steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinist's helper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welder]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Nelson, Airco Welders, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on motion to dismiss. The Nelson, Airco Welders, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many industrial plant employees (e.g., welders, pitman, laborers) and others may face today &#8211; past potential direct and secondary exposure to asbestos and mesothelioma. The court ruled on the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/nelson-airco-welders-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Nelson, Airco Welders, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Krauss, Trane, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/krauss-trane-usa-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesive products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agraco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boilers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borden chemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bricklayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bricklaying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foster Wheeler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeport chemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gould Pumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Wayne Smith Masonry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint compound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaiser aluminum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kirkland masonry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spackling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zurn Industries]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Krauss, Trane, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on an appeal of a summary judgment motion. The Krauss, Trane, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many bricklayers and people in the bricklaying industry may face today &#8211; past potential direct and secondary exposure to asbestos and mesothelioma. The court [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/krauss-trane-usa-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Krauss, Trane, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/a-s-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 19:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ingested Paxil while pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit recently ruled on a motion to remand. A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/a-s-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gottschall, Crane, Shipyards, Navy, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/gottschall-crane-shipyards-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san frnacisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipyards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sophisticated user doctrine]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5978</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Gottschall, Crane, Shipyards, Navy, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A recent case in the Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two ruled on an appeal of a summary judgment motion. The Gottschall, Crane, Shipyards, Navy, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many tire mechanics and workers may face today &#8211; past potential direct and secondary exposure to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/gottschall-crane-shipyards-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Gottschall, Crane, Shipyards, Navy, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valido-Shade, Fen Phen, PPH, PAH &#038; Wyeth</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/valido-shade-fen-phen-pph-pah-wyeth/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fen phen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phentermine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pondimin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary arterial hypertension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary pulmonary hypertension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wyeth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5897</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; Valido-Shade, Fen Phen, PPH, PAH &#38; Wyeth: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania ruled on a motion to transfer. The Valido-Shade, Fen Phen, PPH, PAH &#38; Wyeth case documents what many victims who took the diet drug and weight loss pill FEN PHEN (redux) may face today– potential primary pulmonary hypertension [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/valido-shade-fen-phen-pph-pah-wyeth/">Valido-Shade, Fen Phen, PPH, PAH &#038; Wyeth</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fontan, Janssen, Xarelto &#038; Internal Bleeding</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/fontan-janssen-xarelto-internal-bleeding/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bleeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal bleeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janssen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rivaroxaban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xarelto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xarelto lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xarelto lawyer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5860</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Fontan, Janssen, Xarelto &#38; Internal Bleeding: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania recently ruled on a motion to remand. Fontan, Janssen, Xarelto &#38; Internal Bleeding case documents what many xarelto prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential internal bleeding from the use of xarelto that could result in serious injuries [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/fontan-janssen-xarelto-internal-bleeding/">Fontan, Janssen, Xarelto &#038; Internal Bleeding</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Painter, Take-home, Certainteed, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/painter-take-home-certainteed-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amtico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certainteed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary asbestos dust exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary exposure to asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondhand asbestos exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[take home asbestos exposure]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Painter, Take-home, Certainteed, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on the motion for summary judgment. The review of the Painter, Take-home, Certainteed, Asbestos &#38; Mesothelioma case documents what many secondary exposure &#8211; (secondary asbestos dust exposure &#8211; secondhand asbestos exposure) &#8211; victims may face today &#8211; past potential [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/painter-take-home-certainteed-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Painter, Take-home, Certainteed, Asbestos &#038; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grover &#8211; Ingersoll-Rand &#8211; Take Home &#8211; Asbestos &#8211; Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/grover-ingersoll-rand-take-home-asbestos-mesothelioma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma & Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos dust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbetos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scondary exposure to asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary asbestos dust exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary asbestos exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondhand asbestos exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steam traps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turbines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westinghouse]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Grover &#8211; Ingersoll-Rand &#8211; Take Home &#8211; Asbestos &#8211; Mesothelioma: A recent case in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania ruled on the motion for summary judgment. The review of the Grover &#8211; Ingersoll-Rand &#8211; Take Home &#8211; Asbestos &#8211; Mesothelioma case documents what many secondary exposure &#8211; (secondary asbestos dust exposure &#8211; secondhand asbestos exposure) &#8211; victims [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/grover-ingersoll-rand-take-home-asbestos-mesothelioma/">Grover &#8211; Ingersoll-Rand &#8211; Take Home &#8211; Asbestos &#8211; Mesothelioma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoloft Lawsuit and MDL</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-lawsuit-mdl/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craniosynostosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omphacele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoloft]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zoloft lawsuits are on the rise. A federal Zoloft lawsuit is filed in the federal MDL court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and &#8220;involves allegations that Zoloft, a prescription medication approved for the treatment of depression and other ailments, causes birth defects in children when their mothers ingest the drug while pregnant.&#8221; And, Pfizer [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/zoloft-lawsuit-mdl/">Zoloft Lawsuit and MDL</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fen Phen Lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/fen-phen-lawsuit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fen phen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary arterial hypertension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary pulmonary hypertension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wieght loss drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wyeth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in the most recent (redux) fen phen lawsuit that the maker of the weight-loss diet drug fen phen, redux etc. that took off and went bust in the diet drug craze must face claims that its warning labels were inadequate. The latest Fen phen lawsuit is against Delaware-based Wyeth, formerly [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/fen-phen-lawsuit/">Fen Phen Lawsuit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
