<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Sleuth® ** Case Watch℠ - paxil Archives &#8212; Gooch Law Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legalsleuth.com/tag/paxil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legalsleuth.com/tag/paxil/</link>
	<description>The Source for All Things Legal ℠ - Information, Resources and Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-bav-glaxosmithkline/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve with aortic valve insufficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#38; GlaxoSmithKline is about a mother who took paxil during pregnancy and alleges that the paxil caused her child&#8217;s birth defect (e.g., bicuspid aortic valve, BAV). The Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#38; GlaxoSmithKline case in the United States District Court, D. Connecticut recently ruled on a motion to strike or exclude [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-bav-glaxosmithkline/">Paxil, Birth Defect, BAV &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil, Birth Defect &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxosmithkline/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilateral clubfoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clubfoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil, Birth Defect &#38; GlaxoSmithKline is about a mother who took paxil during pregnancy and alleges that the paxil caused her child&#8217;s birth defect (e.g., clubfoot). The Paxil, Birth Defect &#38; GlaxoSmithKline case in the United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division recently ruled on a motion to strike an expert report. A brief summary of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxosmithkline/">Paxil, Birth Defect &#038; GlaxoSmithKline</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#038; Collier</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxo-collier/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#38; Collier: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division ruled on a motion to dismiss et al. The Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#38; Collier case is about a Missouri mother that took Paxil during her pregnancy and gave birth to a child with a birth defect. A brief summary [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-birth-defect-glaxo-collier/">Paxil, Birth Defect, Glaxo &#038; Collier</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>McLaughlin, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Heart Valve Defect</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/mclaughlin-glaxosmithkline-paxil-heart-valve-defect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart valve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart valve defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssri]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>McLaughlin, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Heart Valve Defect: A recent case in the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit recently ruled on a motion for summary judgment. McLaughlin, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Heart Valve Defect case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential heart valve defects or potential birth defects (e.g., atrial [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/mclaughlin-glaxosmithkline-paxil-heart-valve-defect/">McLaughlin, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Heart Valve Defect</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MN, Smithkline Beechman, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/mn-smithkline-beechman-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 18:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atrial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[septal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beechman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VSD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=7075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>MN, Smithkline Beechman, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Northern Division recently ruled on a motion to remand. MN, Smithkline Beechman, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects (e.g., atrial &#38; septal heart [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/mn-smithkline-beechman-paxil-birth-defects/">MN, Smithkline Beechman, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>JP, McKesson, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/jp-mckesson-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left ventricular hypertrophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulmonary stenosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>JP, McKesson, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. California recently ruled on a motion to remand. JP, McKesson, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of paxil (e.g., for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/jp-mckesson-paxil-birth-defects/">JP, McKesson, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/hensley-forest-pharmaceuticals-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lexapro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division recently ruled on a motion to transfer. Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/hensley-forest-pharmaceuticals-paxil-birth-defects/">Hensley, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/callahan-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aortic valve stenosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicuspid aortic valve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent ductus arteriosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[severe coarctation of the aorta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania recently ruled on a motion to transfer. Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of paxil [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/callahan-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">Callahan, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/kiker-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infant respiratory distress syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ventricular septal defect]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania recently ruled on a motion to remand. Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of paxil (e.g., [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/kiker-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">Kiker, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/a-s-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 19:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ingested Paxil while pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=6020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit recently ruled on a motion to remand. A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/a-s-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">A.S., Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/orrick-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithkline beecham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division recently ruled on a motion remand. Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/orrick-minor-smithkline-beecham-paxil-birth-defects/">Orrick, Minor, Smithkline Beecham, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Re: Zoloft &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/in-re-zoloft-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidepressant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDL 2342]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoloft]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Re: Zoloft &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania recently ruled on a motion on expert testimony. In Re: Zoloft &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many zoloft prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of zoloft during pregnancy. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/in-re-zoloft-birth-defects/">In Re: Zoloft &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/a-p-minor-iolnay-ferez-glaxosmithkline-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac birth defects in babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart murmur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil during pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy and persistent pulmonary hypertension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right Ventricular Hypertrophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tricuspid Atresia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tricuspid atresia type II-B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division recently ruled on a motion for summary judgment. A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/a-p-minor-iolnay-ferez-glaxosmithkline-paxil-birth-defects/">A.P., Minor, Iolnay Ferez, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>J.F., Minor, Moore, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/j-f-minor-moore-glaxosmithkline-paxil-birth-defects/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 03:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Watch℠]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac birth defects in babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chiari I Malformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congenital neural tube defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gsk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lung defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paroxetine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil during pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preganant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssri]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalsleuth.com/?p=5867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>J.F., Minor, Moore, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects: A recent case in the United States District Court, E.D. California recently ruled on a motion to remand. J.F., Minor, Moore, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#38; Birth Defects case documents what many paxil prescription drug users may be experiencing today – potential birth defects in their child from the use of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/j-f-minor-moore-glaxosmithkline-paxil-birth-defects/">J.F., Minor, Moore, Glaxosmithkline, Paxil &#038; Birth Defects</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paxil Lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-lawsuit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Sleuth®]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[club foot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart valve defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paxil lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pphn]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goochlawfirm.com/?p=4110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paxil Lawsuit: In recent years, there have been many paxil lawsuits filed by parents based on injuries sustained by their children.  This type of paxil lawsuit was related to birth defect injuries &#8211; major and/or cardiovascular malformations associated with a specific SSRI (e.g., fluoxetine, paroxetine (PAXIL), sertraline (ZOLOFT), citalopram, escitalopram, and fluvoxamine). In a paxil [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://legalsleuth.com/paxil-lawsuit/">Paxil Lawsuit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://legalsleuth.com">Legal Sleuth®</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
