cashmere bouquet, ford, brakes, crown zellerbach,georgia pacific, drywall joint compound,kent, cigarettes, lorillard, asbestos, mesothelioma, asbestos lawyer, asbestos law firm, asbestos attorney, mesothelioma lawyer, mesothelioma attorney, mesothelioma law firm

Richardson, PCS Phosphate, Asbestos & Mesothelioma


ford, brakes, crown zellerbach,georgia pacific, drywall joint compound,kent, cigarettes, lorillard, asbestos, mesothelioma, asbestos lawyer, asbestos law firm, asbestos attorney, mesothelioma lawyer, mesothelioma attorney, mesothelioma law firmRichardson, PCS Phosphate, Asbestos & Mesothelioma: A recent case in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina ruled on a motion to dismiss.

The Richardson, PCS Phosphate, Asbestos & Mesothelioma case documents what many industrial plant employees (e.g., manufacturing phosphate products used to make food products, fertilizer, and toothpaste) and others may face today – past potential direct and secondary exposure to asbestos and mesothelioma. The court ruled on the appeal.

A brief summary of the facts include:

  • Plaintiff James Richardson began working for PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. (“PCS”, fka Elf Aquitaine, fka Texas Gulf) in 1968.
  • PCS manufactures phosphate products used to make food products, fertilizer, and toothpaste.
  • Although plaintiff started as a concentrator engineer, he became a process engineer beginning in December of 1968. As a process engineer, plaintiff worked throughout the mill department, but the majority of his time was spent working in close proximity to the steam pipes and operating equipment. Plaintiff claimed that he performed “hands-on” work on the plant equipment that contained asbestos.
  • In 1974, he was promoted to mill superintendent. As the superintendent, he also worked closely with operators and maintenance workers in the plant operation areas.
  • Plaintiff recalled that, during this time period, he observed maintenance projects throughout the facility that involved the removal or disturbance of asbestos. In fact, plaintiff contended that he may have overseen projects involving the removal of asbestos-containing insulation or gaskets.
  • Plaintiff remained in the mill superintendent position until 1992 when he became the assistant to the mine manager. In this position, plaintiff was still required to visit the mill department where, up until the early 2000’s, PCS performed asbestos abatement and maintenance projects. Plaintiff stayed in that position until he retired from the company in 1995.
  • In 2009, plaintiff was diagnosed with mesothelioma. He has undergone extensive medical treatment including a lung removal, radiation, and chemotherapy.

 To find out more on the case, see Case No. COA-14-1516 – December 16, 2014.


ASBESTOS & MESOTHELIOMA

For more on asbestos and mesothelioma, please visit the links below:



FREE CASE REVIEWAt the Gooch Law Firm, we pride ourselves on providing our clients reliable representation for even the most challenging cases.

If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, and need an asbestos or mesothelioma lawyer to help you file a mesothelioma lawsuit, contact our office at 1.844.329.5955.


WE ARE HERE TO HELP YOU PROTECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS